6 Reasons Obama-Care Is Bad Medicine

6 reasons Obama-Care is Bad Medicine

Nobody denies that in a rich country like ours, where the borders on the tragic that millions are not a form of health care. I believe that Americans really.

I agree that the reform of health care is essential in America, but I do not believe that the draft of the so-called "universal healthcare", which was signed today by our President the solution. Indeed, I believe that medicine is bad for America.

- First of all, universal health care is reflected by carelessness.

Sweeping reform of the health care system to be adopted in record time in the world? Like the promotion and false nonsense rescue, care for Obama is America's Glen (without justification), and propulsion systems, such as a wall by the Congress (without testing). I mention the lightning war Obama: Create a crisis, and the number crunch, CRAM and legislation. The fact is that the president continue to sell the program, but there is still no plan for him or for the Congress is for sale.

- Secondly, the universality of health care is clearly lead our country deep in debt that gradually shift from the experiences of foreign powers, without any doubts in Washington to end.

Obama said in a press conference on television at the national level, "The reforms in the health sector will not be given to this deficit, is for a reduction." How can you tell if you do not have problems with a plan for health care? If it is not the impact of supply on a large scale in all communities across the nation?

The President is the struggle against the base of the tax on the rhetoric into reality. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the Senate version of the legislation in the health sector is a significant increase in the federal deficit by around 1.0 trillion U.S. dollars for fiscal year 2010 from the 2019th "And what makes a good financial responsibility in the economy and the government, already facing bankruptcy?

- Thirdly, the universal health care impersonalize would ration health care and medical services.

The government takeover of health care in Washington would also include the use of "Exploring the effectiveness of comparison" to the doctors before the treatment, and how much it cost. This would lead to rationing in health care.

Canada and Europe have already shown that the quality of medical nightmares, with a plethora of new rules and new medical rationing. In the services provided by the government, the staff in health care, the more impersonal harassment. More public transport threaten MINUCI runs in our lives.

- Fourthly, health, generally, the competition in the market for health services.

And with regard to the taxpayers the cost of the program? It would be universal health care, the productivity of their future? Other members of taxes in the class (and that would be even more disadvantaged, their productivity), is certainly not for the creation of incentives for Americans to the American dream. And of course they have added impact of the fees for the consumer. Now we can assume that he would be willing to pay 47 million Americans are "universal health care for their surplus?

You can use competitive markets through the creation of monopolies, but it is exactly what the first government universal health care would be the distortion of competition. If the government must do something, you have to hard against the monopolies of health insurance. If the government wants to regulate something, it would be better to regulate health insurance, and not the American people.

- Fifth, universal health care in the future of health professionals in the vicinity of legislators.

With the government-sanctioned Health Care in general, the Legislative Assembly is almost as medical officer and head of the government of a medical report, the staff and the political oversight of the program. This does not, and the end of life, counseling and services. The policy of the Federal based on a relatively small number of medical director (as in most of them), which in turn is responsible for designing and implementing the political and medical procedures which they consider best for the country.

- Sixth, the Universal Health Care increases and the U.S. government continues to slope to socialism.

The nanny is not the solution to our health. Our government has two programs for health care coverage: Medicare (for elderly) and Medicaid (for low-income citizens). The President mentioned in his speech in the last week that the two programs are the largest contributions to the rise of our deficit. So why not a reform, improvement and expansion of these programs, rather than a third (or fourth or fifth), the government bureaucracy medically as "primary health care?

What is needed is a group in Washington Bipartisan is a long time to work and a health program for compromise, not increase taxes (for everyone), the regulation of medical personnel or election of cooperation in healthcare.

Why wait for Washington? Go to http://patientsunitednow.com/ to find out more about your community and you will be able to reform the health care and options for physicians and medical care. Especially on the website of Dr. Betsy McCaughey to http://www.defendyourhealthcare.us./ You are an expert in the field of health and the former Governor of New York and, in fact, read the entire Senate on the bill for universal healthcare. E 'will show many details hidden in the interior, which do not participate in the discussion with the public in the United States.

Obama-care 101: The president's 8 principles

Obama-Care 101: The President'8 principles President Obama said in

The budget released Thursday that he wants Congress to follow a set of eight principles "for the" transform and modernize health care in the United States "as the White House and the Capitol in drafting legislation for health care reform "in the coming years:

1. Protecting the financial health of families. The plan should reduce the growth of premiums and other costs of U.S. citizens and businesses pay for health care. People must be protected because of the catastrophic failure of the disease.

2. To cover health care affordable. The plan should reduce the high administrative costs, unnecessary tests and services, waste and other inefficiencies that consume money without the addition of health.

3. Case of universality. The plan is to put the United States on a clear path for all Americans.

4.cover portability. People should not be locked up in their work to ensure health coverage, and non-American should be denied coverage because of previous reports.

5.Guarantee Choice. The plan would give Americans a choice of health and medical care. They should be able to keep their employer's health care plan.

6. Focus on prevention and wellness. The plan is to invest in public health measures can reduce the cost of our system, such as obesity, physical inactivity and smoking - and to ensure access to preventive treatments.
7.Improving patient safety and quality of care. The plan must ensure the implementation of proven patient safety and provide incentives for changes in the system to reduce variations in patient care. It must support the widespread use of information technologies on health and development of data on the effectiveness of medical interventions to improve the quality of care.

8.Maintaining long-term sustainability of public finances. The health care plan should pay for itself by reducing the rate of growth in costs, improve productivity and provide new sources of income.

Does Obama Care? Part 2

    At the same meeting in the White House last week, the woman said to President Obama on his 105-year-old mother Hazel Homer, a pacemaker implanted five years ago, when the first refusal of the procedure, because it was "too old". When the heart is shown how dynamic and active specializes in this century was that the decision was reversed and the woman is alive today because he got his pacemaker, one thing that never would have occurred in the form of health care to manage the Government's plan President Obama in America.

The girl was a very simple question of the President: All the news health itself and the Congress could devise, it is a state in the types of medical decisions, which are stored in the life of his mother - idiosyncratic decisions based on the "spirit" and the vitality and Decisions of the heart and form, which in this case would have meant his his mother was "too old" to deal with?
Sensing his political bind he tap danced around in a few minutes and then blurted something, sometimes people just abandon the procedure, the doctor and take pills instead of pain - and all for the "best" is assumed.

You can imagine the joy of radio was. But I have looked at the video and I watched President Obama, and honestly I do not think it was in this room, when the woman's mother cases have decided that it opposes. In other words, the president - a man, not a politician, not a bureaucrat - was placed in the role that doctors should - that work only as a person, not a bureaucrat, and that such decisions on idiosyncratic, if the situation requires it - is also likely to be thrown all the rules, the heart and the criteria for a comparative cost-effectiveness through the window and give the pacemaker.

But there is a problem of bureaucratic medicine, what happens when the hospital changed to the DMV, which is precisely what the president tries to make the American public the name of cost control and equal access to equal care for all. When the government makes medical science and gave it to the bureaucrats to implement, there is no humanity, only bureaucrats. There is no room for "gut decisions based on the experience and knowledge of intuition is not the width of the assessments, which can not be fully in line with the formula or algorithm, and justifies review boxes, boxes with the format. When bureaucrats practice medicine, they are not in sympathy with the agent or the IRS, DMV drone.

The concepts of male and vitality to mind is precisely the opposite of bureaucratic thinking. For the bureaucrat is simply a statistical compilation, speculation and medium-sized enterprises in the forecasts. And yes, there are budgets, which means that the whole must respond to all. And finally, it means that rationing, delay, denial and the deterioration of the treatment.

There is a debate so that voters do not like Barack Obama are fighting each political battle with him at the individual level, as if he - a man - is the problem rather than the policies she promotes. These voters will be constantly frustrated by their inability to win against him, and they lose the fight against health care managed by the government, if they do not change their strategies.

It is simply not enough to overcome Obama political enemies. In order to protect U.S. citizens against the insane policies managed by the government, the bureaucracy of medicine, it is necessary to raise the discourse, not heavy of fair play, but a strategic necessity. Obama wins is crazy policy, the fight is a high-friendly, popular man. This means that it is necessary to inform and reassure people that if Obama guy could be a great and friendly boy, his ideas and policies are wrong, badly designed and dangerous, especially in elderly patients.
As the 105-year-old, mother of the President of the question, it does not corrupt politicians, who are the worst, but the politicians who have good intentions, ladies, men with too many bad ideas too, and the power to force all who put us all in danger. The good intentions of good men who have too much power and too little information about how the world works, which is how "politics" is just one of the word "abuse". The health care is handled by the government to kill Grandma. That is why the American common sense and good will to demand the withdrawal of Obama Health Care.